In London, Ontario, Ramada by Wyndham presents a genuinely serious, sharply divided 3.5-rated picture across 1,655 reviews that requires full, direct disclosure. On the positive side, convenient highway-adjacent location draws practical praise: one reviewer describes a great location right off Highway 401 with shopping and restaurants within a five-minute drive, describing two nights with young children as reasonable for the price. A separate reviewer describes clean, spacious rooms with a good-sized pool the kids enjoyed, calling it a reasonable choice during a tournament visit, while another describes excellent staff service and a great pool area for a family-friendly stay.
Worth reporting with complete and necessary honesty given the severity involved: at least one detailed review describes this as by far the worst hotel stayed at in many years, alleging significant, important information was missing from the booking listing. A separate, emphatically worded review urges readers to go anywhere else, describing this as worse than other cheap hotels with questionable safety they’d previously stayed at, while acknowledging some visible effort had been made to clean the rooms despite underlying problems.
Given this genuinely stark split, some families describing perfectly reasonable, clean stays suited to their budget and needs, while others describe this as among the worst hotel experiences of their lives, prospective guests should read the most current, detailed reviews carefully and set conservative expectations, particularly regarding what a booking listing may or may not fully disclose.
For Doggy Deets users, Ramada by Wyndham London shows genuinely inconsistent guest experiences ranging from reasonable family stays to serious complaints about undisclosed issues; reading recent detailed reviews carefully before booking is strongly recommended given this wide range.
